IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND, VA

Civil Action No. 3:13cv543

CLAUDIO FARIASANTOS,
on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

v.

ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANT ROSENBERG &
ASSOCIATES, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING DAMAGES (Docket
No. 66) and PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE
DECLARATION OF DIANE ROSENBERG AND EVIDENCE OF NET WORTH
PURSUANT TO RULE 56(c)(4) AND RULE 37(c)(1) (Docket No. 79).
For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motions will be
denied and Plaintiff s motion will be granted in part and denied
in part.

BACKGROUND

This case arises from debt-collection letters sent by
Defendant Rosenberg & Associates, LLC (“R&A”) that include
disclosures in alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collections
Fariasantos v. Rosenberg & Associates, LLC

[…]

.

Comments

comments