YVANOVA v. NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION AMICUS BRIEF OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

YVANOVA v. NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION AMICUS BRIEF OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT

YVANOVA v. NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION  AMICUS BRIEF OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT

H/T Abby

In The Supreme Court Of California

TSVETANA YVANOVA,
Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE
CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN
SERVICING, LLC, WESTERN
PROGRESSIVE, LLC, and DEUTSCHE
BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,
et al,
Defendant-Respondent.

EXCERPT-

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

INTRODUCTION …………………………………. 1
STATEMENT OF INTEREST …………………………………. 2
ARGUMENT …………………………………. 3
I. CALIFORNIA HAS A STRONG PUBLIC POLICY
IN FAVOR OF PROTECTING HOMEOWNERS
FROM WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE …………………………. 3

A. California’s Foreclosure Statutes Strike a
Careful Balance Between Efficiency in
Foreclosure and Homeowner Protection ……………….. 4

B. The Recent Enactment of the HBOR Reflects a
Legislative Intent to Protect Homeowners
Against Abusive Practices, Including
Foreclosures by the Wrong Party ………………………….. 5

II. A HOMEOWNER MAY BRING A CAUSE OF
ACTION FOR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE ON
THE BASIS THAT THE ASSIGNMENT OF DEBT
IS INVALID ……………………………………………………………….. 7

A. The Foreclosing Party’s Lack of Authority Is a
Proper Basis on which the Homeowner May
Challenge a Foreclosure ………………………………………. 7

B. Because a Void Assignment Deprives a
Foreclosing Party of the Authority to Foreclose,
a Homeowner May Bring a Wrongful
Foreclosure Action on That Basis ……………………….. 10

C. A Homeowner Is Harmed When an Entity
Without The Authority To Do So Forecloses on
Her Home ………………………………………………………… 14

D. Permitting Wrongful Foreclosure Actions to
Challenge Invalid Assignments is Sound Policy …… 17

CONCLUSION ……………………………………………………………………………… 19

[…]

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8368 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

6 Responses to “YVANOVA v. NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION AMICUS BRIEF OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT”

  1. Mike says:

    Thank you Abby for the heads up! Now we need to pray the court agrees that the law matters more than the “too big to fail” banks and their high paid attorney/lobbyists.

  2. SoCal7 says:

    Very strong argument in favor of public policy favoring standing! SC should reverse.

  3. mike says:

    Google Mark Didak Amicus Brief Yvanova for another great brief filed in support of the Appellant. Well done!

  4. Domain says:

    I know this is good news, but my gut feeling will that (and unfortunately) the court may not reverse.

    The only reason is that there are at least to other cases that the California Supreme Court has denied review to with the same late pooling and servicing agreement transfer.

    The obvious question is why would they deny the two latest challenges if they were going to reverse this one?

    With the exception of showing bias as stated in Silaga (where the original lender would not have foreclosed, I just don’t see it.

    I hope I wrong, but if someone can answer the above question, I don’t think that I am.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] her bank in the California Supreme Court for failing to prove standing to foreclose, and she got an amicus brief of support from Kamala Harris, the state’s attorney […]

  2. […] her bank in the California Supreme Court for failing to prove standing to foreclose, and she got an amicus brief of support from Kamala Harris, the state’s attorney […]


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives