Southside, LLC v SunTrust Bank (In re Southside, LLC) | Bankr. N.D. Ga. – Attorney Fees: Following Local Law Can Mean the Difference Between Collecting or Not - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Southside, LLC v SunTrust Bank (In re Southside, LLC) | Bankr. N.D. Ga. – Attorney Fees: Following Local Law Can Mean the Difference Between Collecting or Not

Southside, LLC v SunTrust Bank (In re Southside, LLC) | Bankr. N.D. Ga. – Attorney Fees: Following Local Law Can Mean the Difference Between Collecting or Not

Bankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights –

A debtor objected to attorney fees included in the proof of claim filed by a mortgagee, and the mortgagee moved for relief from the automatic stay to exercise its rights under a security deed securing the debtor’s guaranty based in part on the debtor’s lack of equity in the property.

The lender’s proof of claim initially included attorney fees of $275,000 (15% of the outstanding principal and interest as of the petition date). It was later amended to claim ~$184,000 in attorney fees (based on a statutory formula of 15% of the first $500 of outstanding principal and interest and 10% of the excess). The lender acknowledged that actual fees were ~$149,000.

The debtor objected, arguing that the lender was limited to reasonable actual fees. In particular, the debtor had guaranteed a note, and an addendum to the note stated: “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained within the Note or other Loan Documents … any reference to attorney fees accrued to the account of the Borrower or any Guarantor shall be limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees actually incurred.”

[Bankruptcy-RealEstate-Insights]

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11543 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives