HSBC Bank v. Donaghy | Superior Ct. of PA - There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
PENNSYLVANIA

HSBC BANK, NA AS TRUSTEE
Appellee

AMY C. DONAGHY
Appellant

EXCERPT:
Accordingly, viewing the record in the light most favor able to the non- moving party and resolving all doubts as the existence of a genuine issue of material fact against the moving party, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on its foreclosure complaint. There is a factual dispute as to whether Appellee complied with Sections 20 and 22 of the mortgage agreement.

Judgment reversed. Case remanded. Jurisdiction relinquished.