Winston Muhammad and Janet Muhammad v. BAC Home Loans Servicing | FL 4DCA - No Evidence of Standing...We reverse the final judgment of foreclosure entered in this case

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Winston Muhammad and Janet Muhammad v. BAC Home Loans Servicing | FL 4DCA – No Evidence of Standing…We reverse the final judgment of foreclosure entered in this case

Winston Muhammad and Janet Muhammad v. BAC Home Loans Servicing | FL 4DCA – No Evidence of Standing…We reverse the final judgment of foreclosure entered in this case

Winston Muhammad and Janet Muhammad v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, 4D13-1580 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Filed: September 10th, 2014

Status: Precedential

Docket Number: 4D13-1580

Fingerprint: de9957bbc25918da70703c41003a223713c62d26

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
July Term 2014

WINSTON MUHAMMAD and JANET MUHAMMAD,
Appellants,

v.

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,
Appellee.

No. 4D13-1580

[September 10, 2014]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Miette K. Burnstein, Judge; L.T. Case No.
10036145CACE.

Winston and Janet Muhammad, Lauderhill, pro se.

Lance T. Davies of Butler & Hosch, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion and
substitute the following in its place.

We reverse the final judgment of foreclosure entered in this case.
Appellants allege that the appellee failed to prove its standing to foreclose
at the trial. Not only was there no evidence of standing, but the trial court
treated the matter as though it were ruling on a motion for summary
judgment. It never took testimony and merely interrogated the parties as
to their respective positions, then ruled in favor of foreclosure. As no trial
was ever conducted, a final judgment should not have been entered. We
remand for a new trial, in which both parties may submit evidence
necessary to sustain their respective positions.

Reversed and remanded.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur.
* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

2

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8690 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives