HSBC vs. MILLER | NYSC – Plaintiff 2nd Attempt to Foreclose…This Court Finds NO Reference to Def. Miller’s Obligation in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement…PSA & Lost Note Goes Down in Flames - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

HSBC vs. MILLER | NYSC – Plaintiff 2nd Attempt to Foreclose…This Court Finds NO Reference to Def. Miller’s Obligation in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement…PSA & Lost Note Goes Down in Flames

Posted on02 September 2014.

HSBC vs. MILLER | NYSC – Plaintiff 2nd Attempt to Foreclose…This Court Finds NO Reference to Def. Miller’s Obligation in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement…PSA & Lost Note Goes Down in Flames

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SULLIVAN

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A3
TRUSTEE FOR WELLS FARGO ASSET SECURITIES
CORPORATION, MORTGAGE ASSET-BACKED PASS
THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-PA2
Plaintiffs

against

JEFFREY F. MILLER,
CHASE BANK USA, N.A.,
GEMINI CAPITAL GROUP, LLC,
Defendants

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST Co. of Am. V. DAVIS | NYSC “Smoke and Mirrors, Assignment Flawed?, Genuineness of plaintiff’s possession of the mortgage?, Plaintiff Atty Sanctioned, HAMP” Decided on June 29, 2011 Supreme Court, Kings County Deutsche...
  2. U.S. Bank N.A. v Pia | NYSC – Plaintiff cannot escape responsibility for the loan it acquired. Public policy neither provides for shifting the burden of Plaintiff’s violation of TILA to Defendants, nor does it allow for Plaintiff to claim it is somehow insulated or protected from the obligation to correct the violation they acquired Decided on August 26, 2014 Supreme Court, Putnam County  ...
  3. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Simmons | NYSC – Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that it complied with its CPLR §3408(f) obligation to “negotiate in good faith.” STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF GREENE JPMORGAN...
  4. Bank of Am., N.A. v Rausher | NYSC – Clearly, plaintiff’s refusal to even consider the defendant’s loan modification has violated its obligation to negotiate in good faith pursuant to CPLR 3408(f) Decided on January 22, 2014 Supreme Court, Ulster County  ...
  5. Bank of N.Y. v Waters | NYSC – Most disturbingly, Plaintiff presents the Court with two different versions of the note, one of which was altered and is not a true copy Decided on April 15, 2013 Supreme Court, Kings County  ...

This post was written by:

- who has written 11546 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author


One Response to “HSBC vs. MILLER | NYSC – Plaintiff 2nd Attempt to Foreclose…This Court Finds NO Reference to Def. Miller’s Obligation in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement…PSA & Lost Note Goes Down in Flames”

  1. Charles Reed says:
    09/02/2014 at 11:00 pm

    Who is the trustee of the Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu) Ginnie Mae MBS? Wells Fargo Bank is acting as the mortgage servicer and custodian of records, but is lying to the local land recorders by submitting assignment of the security instrument, which places them in the position of “holder in due course” when the only reason the are holding the Note is because they are acting as an extension of the one that placed the loan in their care.

    WaMu, Countrywide and IndyMac don’t exist as lender after 2008, and as they did not have physical possession of the blank endorsed Notes at the time they went under or merged, and the Notes no longer had a debt attached to them, meant that there was a “No Standing” issue!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply


Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments

175,138 spam blocked by Akismet