MARROW vs BANK OF AMERICA | This just in … State of Montana … against Bank of America - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

MARROW vs BANK OF AMERICA | This just in … State of Montana … against Bank of America

MARROW vs BANK OF AMERICA | This just in … State of Montana … against Bank of America

DA 13-0241
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
2014 MT 117

ABRAHAM B. MORROW and BETTY JEAN MORROW,
Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP, fka COUNTRYWIDE HOME
LOANS SERVICING, LP,
Defendants and Appellees.

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the First Judicial District,
In and For the County of Lewis and Clark, Cause No. CDV 2011-491
Honorable Kathy Seeley, Presiding Judge

Chief Justice Mike McGrath delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶1 Abraham B. Morrow and Betty Jean Morrow appeal from an order of the First
Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, granting Defendant Bank of America’s
motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
¶2 The following issues are presented for review:
¶3 Issue One: Whether the District Court erred in finding the Morrows failed to
establish the existence of an oral contract for modification of their loan.
¶4 Issue Two: Whether the District Court erred in finding that Bank of America owed
no common law or fiduciary duty to the Morrows.
¶5 Issue Three: Whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment to
Bank of America on the Morrows’ claim of negligent misrepresentation.
¶6 Issue Four: Whether the District Court erred in finding that the Statute of Frauds
precluded the Morrows’ claims of actual fraud, constructive fraud, and violations of the
Montana Consumer Protection Act.
¶7 Issue Five: Whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment to
Bank of America on the Morrows’ claim of actual fraud.
¶8 Issue Six: Whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment to Bank
of America on the Morrows’ claim of constructive fraud.
¶9 Issue Seven: Whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment to
Bank of America on the Morrows’ claim under the Montana Consumer Protection Act.

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11502 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives