Status: Precedential
View original: From the court
<excerpt>
One of the consultants, Allonhill, LLC (“Allonhill”), was engaged as an independent consultant for Aurora Bank until its termination at the direction of the OCC due to a conflict presented by Allonhill’s previous work and the independence requirements of the OCC
in connection with the IFR. See Ex. 1 (Walker Decl.) at Ex. D, p. 15.
__________________
5 Williams & Connolly is counsel for the terminated consultant, Allonhill.
-5-
. . .
Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the Comptroller’s motion for summary judgment and denies the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and also its request for a hearing in the matter.
SO ORDERED this 30 day of April, 2014.11
REGGIE B. WALTON
United States District Judge
More…
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, LLP v. OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OF CURRENCY
District Of Columbia District Court, Case No. 1:13-cv-00396
 12 |
Filed: 7/29/2013, Entered: None | |
| RESPONSE re 10 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Hearing filed by OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OF CURRENCY. | ||
| 11 |
Filed: 7/29/2013, Entered: None | |
| Memorandum in opposition to re 9 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, LLP. | ||
| 9 |
Filed: 6/28/2013, Entered: None | |
| Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OF CURRENCY | ||
Docket
Complaint
Complaint attachment 1
Complaint attachment 2