THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v PRECIADO | CA Supreme Court – Unlawful Detainer, Judgments Reversed - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v PRECIADO | CA Supreme Court – Unlawful Detainer, Judgments Reversed

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v PRECIADO | CA Supreme Court – Unlawful Detainer, Judgments Reversed

Filed 8/19/13 (ordered published by Supreme Ct. 3/19/14)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
APPELLATE DIVISION

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

VIDAL A. PRECIADO et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ROLAND LUKE et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.

EXCERPTS:

THE COURT*
The appeal by appellants Vidal Preciado (“Preciado”), Roland Luke (“Luke”), and Kenneth Henderson (“Henderson”) (collectively, “Appellants”) from the unlawful detainer judgments entered on March 16, 2012, came on regularly for hearing and was heard and submitted on August 16, 2013. We hereby hold as follows:

[…]

Conclusion
The judgments entered on March 16, 2012, are REVERSED and the trial court is instructed to entered judgments in favor of Appellants. Appellants are the prevailing party and are entitled to costs on appeal. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.891(a)(2).)

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11552 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v PRECIADO | CA Supreme Court – Unlawful Detainer, Judgments Reversed”

  1. Mike says:

    Looking at the CA APPELLATE COURT OF APPEAL Docket…not viewable for some reason. Can anyone offer an explanation? Please direct me to a place where filings can be viewed.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives