RIGALI v. ONEWEST BANK | Super. Court of CA - Order Denying Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment and or Adjudication

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

RIGALI v. ONEWEST BANK | Super. Court of CA – Order Denying Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and or Adjudication

RIGALI v. ONEWEST BANK | Super. Court of CA – Order Denying Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and or Adjudication

via DUBIN LAW OFFICES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LUIS OBISPO

IRENE RIGALI; GREG RIGALI; IRENE
RIGALI, as Guradian as litem for Meghan
Rigali,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ONEWEST BANK, a Federal Savings Bank, INDYMAC MORTGAGE
SERVICES, a Division of OneWest Bank;
NDEx, West LLC, a Delaware Corp., U.S. Bank National Assoc., a Federally
Chartered Bank, as Trustee for GSR LOAN
MORTGAGE TRUST; and DOES 1 through
150, inclusive,

Defendant.

[ipaper docId=142462288 access_key=key-1bvkfvbzvllng2ep3yy8 height=600 width=600 /]

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8611 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives