Yes, the Financial System Is Rigged. Why Shouldn't You Profit From That Knowledge?

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Yes, the Financial System Is Rigged. Why Shouldn’t You Profit From That Knowledge?

Yes, the Financial System Is Rigged. Why Shouldn’t You Profit From That Knowledge?

Everyone knows this and they all profit from this Ponzi Scheme including those in D.C., Judges, States, Counties… you name it…except for YOU!

If you were to ask me where to invest today, I’d say invest in the most corrupt companies out there because most likely the politicians have their hands in those books and no amount of fraud will put an end to their rigging.

Business week-

Our system is rigged. Unfair. Hopelessly neglectful of the little guy.

All true. But do you really have a better choice? Did you honestly think Washington was going to let it all fail—and for good? After all, who’s backing Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC), which are almost single-handedly backing the resurgent mortgage market? Who pumped more than $2 trillion into suppressing interest rates to record lows?

[BUSINESS WEEK]

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8607 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

2 Responses to “Yes, the Financial System Is Rigged. Why Shouldn’t You Profit From That Knowledge?”

  1. Wall street is a con game. This is mostlikely artificially boosted by Wall street and will crash taking the gambled funds like a casino takes your gambled funds. No wonder the banks have huge profits, it appears the TBTF/TBTJ banks stole free houses, due to the judges and ignorance of the public that walked away or were forced out anyway by lack of knowledge and lack of judicial support to save the homes from the parasite banks. Judges claiming they are not going to givefree houses to the public nomatter how the judge has to break the law, but all is acceptable to give free houses to the banks. Trillion of free houses to sell must be a windfall for the banks.

  2. A post to me from an emailer friend: A great play on Abbott and Costello’s “Who’s on First” skit.

    Mar 8, 2013 at 8:57 AM
    Subject: Abbot and Costello tells the truth their way

    So how can over 873,000 people come off of the unemployment rolls when there were only a little over 114,000 jobs created? Below is a transcript of how Abbott and Costello would have explained it!

    Untitled attachment 00094.jpg

    COSTELLO: I want to talk about the unemployment rate in America.

    ABBOTT: Good Subject. These are terrible times. It’s 7.8%.

    COSTELLO: That many people are out of work?

    ABBOTT: No, that’s 14.7%.

    COSTELLO: You just said 7.8%.

    ABBOTT: 7.8% are unemployed.

    COSTELLO: Right, 7.8% out of work.

    ABBOTT: No, that’s 14.7%.

    COSTELLO: Okay, so it’s 14.7% unemployed.

    ABBOTT: No, that’s 7.8%.

    COSTELLO: WAIT A MINUTE. Is it 7.8% or 14.7%?

    ABBOTT: 7.8% are unemployed. 14.7% are out of work.

    COSTELLO: If you are out of work you are unemployed.

    ABBOTT: No, Congress said you can’t count the “Out of Work” as the unemployed. You have to look for work to be unemployed.

    COSTELLO: BUT THEY ARE OUT OF WORK!!!

    ABBOTT: No, you miss his point.

    COSTELLO: What point?

    ABBOTT: Someone who doesn’t look for work can’t be counted with those who look for work. It wouldn’t be fair.

    COSTELLO: To whom?

    ABBOTT: The unemployed.

    COSTELLO: But ALL of them are out of work.

    ABBOTT: No, the unemployed are actively looking for work. Those who are out of work gave up looking and if you give up, you are no longer in the ranks of the unemployed.

    COSTELLO: So if you’re off the unemployment roles that would count as less unemployment?

    ABBOTT: Unemployment would go down. Absolutely!

    COSTELLO: The unemployment just goes down because you don’t look for work?

    ABBOTT: Absolutely it goes down. That’s how they get it to 7.8%. Otherwise it would be 14.7%. Our government doesn’t want you to read about a 14.7% unemployment rate.

    COSTELLO: That would be tough on those running for reelection.

    ABBOTT: Absolutely.

    COSTELLO: Wait, I got a question for you. That means there are two ways to bring down the unemployment number?

    ABBOTT: Two ways is correct.

    COSTELLO: Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job?

    ABBOTT: Correct.

    COSTELLO: And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking for a job?

    ABBOTT: Bingo.

    COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down and the easier of the two is to have people stop looking for work.

    ABBOTT: Now you’re thinking like an Economist.

    COSTELLO: I don’t even know what I just said!

    ABBOTT: Oh, now you’re thinking like Congress!

    Taken from a wise emailer who sent this to me.
    Those who REALLY fight, sometimes win; those who quit, give up and walk away, ALWAYS lose.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives