Charley v. Green Tree Servicing | Fla. 4th DCA - Two Banks Simultaneously Attempting to Foreclose on the Same Mortgage

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Charley v. Green Tree Servicing | Fla. 4th DCA – Two Banks Simultaneously Attempting to Foreclose on the Same Mortgage

Charley v. Green Tree Servicing | Fla. 4th DCA –  Two Banks Simultaneously Attempting to Foreclose on the Same Mortgage

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
January Term 2013

NADIA CHARLEY and ELYSEE CHARLEY,
Appellants,

v.

GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC,
Appellee.

No. 4D11-551

[March 6, 2013]

POLEN, J.

The defendants appeal the trial court’s order granting summary
judgment of foreclosure in favor of Green Tree. We reverse summary
judgment because we find there were genuine issues of material fact,
including, but not limited to, the issue of whether Green Tree had
standing to foreclose.

Standing to foreclose may be established by either an assignment or
equitable transfer of the mortgage prior to the filing of the complaint.
McLean v. JP Morgan Chase Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 79 So. 3d 170, 173 (Fla.
4th DCA 2012). “[T]he plaintiff must prove that it had standing to
foreclose when the complaint was filed.” Id. We reverse because we find
that there were genuine issues of material fact, including, but not limited
to, the issue of whether Green Tree had standing to foreclose at the time
the complaint was filed in this action. Id.; see also Rigby v. Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., 84 So. 3d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Although it is not necessary to address the other issues on appeal, we
find it problematic that two different plaintiffs filed separate actions to
foreclose o n th e same mortgage. Once aware that there were two
separate foreclosure actions on the same mortgage, it would be wise to
consolidate these actions. Even so, the defendants were able to
adequately litigate the instant action, which is the only case on appeal in
this court. Contra Ruscalleda v. HSBC Bank USA, 43 So. 3d 947 (Fla. 3d
DCA 2010) (reversing on the grounds that the confusion caused by two
banks simultaneously attempting to foreclose on the same mortgage
resulted in the defendants not filing a timely answer in the case on
appeal). Nonetheless, and because we hold there were genuine issues of
material fact below, we reverse the trial court’s entry of final summary
judgment.

Reversed and Remanded.
GROSS, J., and SHAHOOD, GEORGE A., Senior Judge, concur.
* * *
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Peggy Gehl, Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-2278 CACE.

James Jean-Francois of James Jean-Francois, P.A., Hollywood, for
appellant.
Roy A. Diaz, Diana B. Matson and Kathleen E. Angione of Smith Hiatt
& Diaz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing

Down Load PDF of This Case

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8687 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “Charley v. Green Tree Servicing | Fla. 4th DCA – Two Banks Simultaneously Attempting to Foreclose on the Same Mortgage”

  1. Rob Harrington says:

    so how many blue ink notes could possibly show up in this case? —> http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/03/whistleblower-wells-fargo-fabricated-mortgage-documents-on-a-mass-basis.html#comment-1125392

    If you suspect FORGED NOTES in your case, contact us – rob.bpia@gmail.com

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives