Abeel v. Bank of America, etc., et al. | First Amended – Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Abeel v. Bank of America, etc., et al. | First Amended – Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury

Abeel v. Bank of America, etc., et al. | First Amended – Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury

UPDATE: Neil Barofsky said “I have nothing to do with the $43t law suit against the banks and the quotes attributed to me are false. A likely scam.”

DISCLOSURE:

This lawsuit involves Mitchell Stein’s Law Firm Spire Law Group, LLP. Mr. Stein has been sued by CA AG Kamala Harris.

Current Status via State Bar of California:  Not eligible to practice law (Not Entitled)

From the Press release:

The complaint – which has now been fully served on thousands of the “Banksters and their Co-Conspirators” – makes it irrefutable that the epicenter of this laundering and racketeering enterprise has been and continues to be Wall Street and continues to involve the very “Banksters” located there who have repeatedly asked in the past to be “bailed out” and to be “bailed out” in the future.

[…]

In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) – involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver – Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former “communications director” for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the “Banksters” themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

[ipaper docId=111239539 access_key=key-fx6a1mkjzu07f2dcpny height=600 width=600 /]

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11546 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

4 Responses to “Abeel v. Bank of America, etc., et al. | First Amended – Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury”

  1. JIMI says:

    great law suit long over due

  2. Rustled Jimbos says:

    Trolls being trolled by trolls, being trolled by lawyers – the troll of all trolls

  3. twobirds says:

    The figure of 43 trillion $ is not quite accurate. I read the first amended complaint and discovered the plaintiffs are entitled to punitive damages, treble damages, and unspecified “other” damages to be determined by the jury. I did the math, and calculated if the lawsuit goes right, the total amount of all claims and damages can exceed 1.7 quadrillion $. This figure comes close to approximating at least half of the “value” of paper in the derivatives market. Could this lawsuit represent the collapse of the derivatives bubble we have been anticipating for some time now?

  4. testyi says:

    http://goo.gl/koMnC
    Yeah… The conspiracy story here is beyond ridiculous. lets get real for a moment. Check out that link, neat timeline slideshow..

    I would never give a known foreclosure-victim targeting slick TV lawyer my only $ available to defend against the banks..

    ‘COMRADE CAPITALIST’ <– talk about a propaganda quip – anyone who trusts people who put these words in their press release will…. Well, the courts will treat you poorly for it…. All part of Stein's Plan.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives