Wells Fargo's Servicer-Driven Foreclosure: Is Stumpf's Company Vicious and Incompetent or Vicious and Greedy?


Wells Fargo’s Servicer-Driven Foreclosure: Is Stumpf’s Company Vicious and Incompetent or Vicious and Greedy?

Wells Fargo’s Servicer-Driven Foreclosure: Is Stumpf’s Company Vicious and Incompetent or Vicious and Greedy?

Abigail Field-

Well DOERs, John Stumpf, CEO of Wells Fargo, is a schmuck.

CEO Stumpf knew (because DOERs told him) that the only reason grandma Patricia Martin faced foreclosure was because a Wells Fargo employee–Stumpf’s employee–lied to her daughter about late fees, and then rejected her for the loan modification it told her to apply for. Why did Wells reject Grandma Martin’s modification application? Well, given the facts, I see two possibilities. Stumpf’s company is incredibly incompetent or deadly sin-level greedy. Either way Stumpf’s Wells Fargo is vicious.

Vicious, Yes. Also Incompetent and/or Greedy...

[Reality Check]

image: stcloudst

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



This post was written by:

- who has written 9281 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “Wells Fargo’s Servicer-Driven Foreclosure: Is Stumpf’s Company Vicious and Incompetent or Vicious and Greedy?”

  1. Dwayne says:

                                     IN THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF COBB COUNTY
                                                      STATE OF GEORGIA
    CASE No. 12-E-02281
    Defendant’s Name and Address:
    Elmer Weir
    1156 Frog Leap Trail NW
    Kennesaw, GA 30152,
    Plaintiff’s Name and Address
    Federal National Mortgage Association
    3525 Piedmont Road NE, Bldg 6 Ste 700
    Atlanta, GA 30305
    Now comes Elmer Weir and states as follows:
    Defendant, Elmer Weir is a resident of Kennesaw, Cobb County Georgia and Resides at 1156 Frog Leap
    Trail NW, Kennesaw GA 30152, and will continue to make this His Primary Resident until the Court decides otherwise.
    Foreclosure Sale was Unfair and Unjust, and Defendant seeks the Right to Redeem Property.
    a. Breach of Loan Agreement.
    b. Promissory Estoppels.
    c. Negligent Loan Management.
    d. Act of Fraud.
    e. Usury and Negligence.
    f. Unfair and Deceptive Acts or Practices.
    g. Mortgage is still under review by the O.C.C
    h. Investor Interference.
    i. Wrongful Termination.
    j. Failure to Renew Term Note.
    k. Misused current Modification guidelines.
    l. Delay- Stall Tactics made by Server/ Investor that has cause financial and emotional harm to defendant.
    m. Defendant was in the middle of a Loan Modification, and was Foreclose on without given notice of denial even though an approval was presented to Investor by server.
    n. Server of the Loan/ Investor never made a genuine effort to Modify Loan…. Borrower was played in prolong game.
    o. Market Value of property is $46,000 more than the Principal Balance.
    Wherefore     respectfully requests that the Honorable Court:
    . Hold a hearing on the matter.
    . Make appropriate order concerning  Eviction and responsibilities, together with ancillary matters
    . Grant such other and further relief as may be equitable and just.  AND, cost incurred in the above mention case, Attorney cost and court fees accordingly will be recovered from Plaintiff.
    . Defendant will be represented by Legal Counsel, which will be furnish to the court at a later date..
                                                                                                                  Respectfully Submitted
                                                                                                                   Elmer Weir


Leave a Reply

Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com


Please Support Me!

All Of These Are Troll Comments