The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court justices signaled last month they may rule in favor of Eaton when they asked parties in the case to submit briefs arguing whether such a decision should be applied retroactively or only to future lending. If retroactive, it would cloud the titles of the 40,000 Massachusetts properties seized in the last five years and while the ruling only applies to the state, it could serve as a model for homeowners trying to overturn foreclosures in other states.

Bloomberg-

The highest court in Massachusetts is poised to rule as soon as this month on a foreclosure case that could lead to a surge in claims from home owners seeking to overturn seizures.

The justices are deciding whether to uphold a lower court ruling that gave a Boston home back to Henrietta Eaton after Sam Levine, a 25-year-old Harvard Law School student, argued in front of the nation’s oldest appellate court that the loan servicer made mistakes when it foreclosed because it didn’t hold the note proving she was obliged to pay the mortgage.

“If the Massachusetts court says this defense works, that would have a huge ripple effect across the country,” said Kurt Eggert, a professor at Chapman University School of Law in Orange, California.

[BLOOMBERG]

Related posts:

1. REQUIRED READING: Marie McDonnell’s Supplemental Brief in EATON vs. FANNIE MAE If you want to know where the bodies are buried,...
2. EATON v. FANNIE MAE – ORAL ARGUMENTS You may access all briefs and hear oral arguments by...
3. AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF MARIE MCDONNELL, CFE FOR EATON v. FANNIE MAE Supreme Judicial Court FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS NO. SJC-11041...
4. AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF PROFESSOR ADAM J. LEVITIN FOR EATON v. FANNIE MAE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT S.J.C. NO. 11041 HENRIETTA...
5. Guest Post: Eaton – Dividing the Mortgage Loan and Affirming the Consequent Written by Gregory M. Lemelson In January the Massachusetts supreme...