One by One, judges are going to finally have enough of the ponzi’s.

To the judges who aren’t turning a blind eye… thank you.

NYT-

A federal judge in Wisconsin has challenged the Securities and Exchange Commission over a proposed settlement of fraud charges against a publicly traded company, citing as a precedent the agency’s pending case against Citigroup.

That represents a significant expansion of the impact of the Citigroup case, in which Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Federal District Court in New York threw out a proposed settlement between the company and the S.E.C.

Judge Rakoff said he had rejected the Citigroup settlement because there were no established facts on which to base a decision whether the settlement was “fair, reasonable, adequate and in the public interest.”

[NEW YORK TIMES]

Related posts:

1. Judge rejects $285M Citigroup settlement, says the case should go to trial so the public can know the truth Get all these cases away from the regulators reach and...
2. MATT TAIBBI: Finally, a Judge Stands up to Wall Street Rolling Stone- Federal judge Jed Rakoff, a former prosecutor with...
3. SEC, in hot seat over Citi settlement, also seeks to strike accord with Fannie, Freddie It won’t be fun for Citigroup Inc. and the Securities...
4. Judge rejects Citigroup’s $75 million settlement with SEC By Zachary A. Goldfarb Washington Post Staff Writer Monday, August...
5. Judge Rakoff’s Ruling in S.E.C. v. Citigroup Global Markets UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S....