Why does everyone want to put us right back in the hands of the criminal banks that victimized us in the first place as if it’s a reasonable cure? When you ‘buy a lemon,’ would YOU go back to them Again? Would Beau go back, or send a member of HIS family back to the perpetrator to deal? PAH-leeze!
How is it that the totally unrepentant perpetrator, who dared to submit false documents in a court of law against me- the victim of his crime- get to say yea, or nay, to whether or not I can get restored to a paying customer? It was upon their last ‘nay’ to receiving payment that I was forced into ‘deadbeat’ status.
When I paid a year’s worth of my bankruptcy plan, it was they who said ‘Nah. Not good enough. Plan DENIED.’
These ‘businessmen’ signed consent orders admitting their breaking of numerous laws under the catch-all of robo-signing. They would cease and desist from such practices. I’m scheduled to go into court again against them. What’s the evidence? Robo-signed.
How much more tolerance would you require of the victim of a crime. It’s like the perpetrator shot me once- but only got me in the leg. He shot again, but only got me in the arm. When will someone wrest this perpetrator’s weapon and take away his chance to get off the third shot?
Why are we elevating the criminal banker and never seating a victim at the table? This is not productive dialogue. It’s more elitist monologue. More blame the victim. More ‘fiddle’ while the bankers ‘take out’ middle class America in its entirety.
Why does everyone want to put us right back in the hands of the criminal banks that victimized us in the first place as if it’s a reasonable cure? When you ‘buy a lemon,’ would YOU go back to them Again? Would Beau go back, or send a member of HIS family back to the perpetrator to deal? PAH-leeze!
How is it that the totally unrepentant perpetrator, who dared to submit false documents in a court of law against me- the victim of his crime- get to say yea, or nay, to whether or not I can get restored to a paying customer? It was upon their last ‘nay’ to receiving payment that I was forced into ‘deadbeat’ status.
When I paid a year’s worth of my bankruptcy plan, it was they who said ‘Nah. Not good enough. Plan DENIED.’
These ‘businessmen’ signed consent orders admitting their breaking of numerous laws under the catch-all of robo-signing. They would cease and desist from such practices. I’m scheduled to go into court again against them. What’s the evidence? Robo-signed.
How much more tolerance would you require of the victim of a crime. It’s like the perpetrator shot me once- but only got me in the leg. He shot again, but only got me in the arm. When will someone wrest this perpetrator’s weapon and take away his chance to get off the third shot?
Why are we elevating the criminal banker and never seating a victim at the table? This is not productive dialogue. It’s more elitist monologue. More blame the victim. More ‘fiddle’ while the bankers ‘take out’ middle class America in its entirety.
Am I being ‘small’ again?
THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY HAS NO ATTORNEY GENERAL.