Wroblewski v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC. – FL 5DCA Reverses SJ for failure to comply with the condition precedent contained in the mortgage, requiring notice and opportunity to cure - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

Wroblewski v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC. – FL 5DCA Reverses SJ for failure to comply with the condition precedent contained in the mortgage, requiring notice and opportunity to cure

Wroblewski v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC. – FL 5DCA Reverses SJ for failure to comply with the condition precedent contained in the mortgage, requiring notice and opportunity to cure

MICHELLE WROBLEWSKI, Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 5D10-1068.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed September 9, 2011.
Tanner Andrews of Tanner Andrews, P.A., Deland, for Appellant.

Michael Cavendish and Ana D. Johnson of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment of foreclosure because Appellee failed to overcome Appellant’s assertion in her answer that Appellee had failed to comply with the condition precedent contained in the mortgage, requiring notice and opportunity to cure. Morrison v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 36 Fla. L. Weekly D1646 (Fla. 5th DCA July 29, 2011); Konsulian v. Busey Bank, N.A., 61 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

[ipaper docId=65026737 access_key=key-1z5wtn1bnnxpigk27dyu height=600 width=600 /]

 

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11505 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “Wroblewski v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC. – FL 5DCA Reverses SJ for failure to comply with the condition precedent contained in the mortgage, requiring notice and opportunity to cure”

  1. dinsfla says:

    Wroblewski v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 5th Dist. 2011

    MICHELLE WROBLEWSKI, Appellant,
    v.
    AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., Appellee.

     

    Case No. 5D10-1068.
    District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. 

    Opinion filed September 9, 2011.
    Tanner Andrews of Tanner Andrews, P.A., Deland, for Appellant.Michael Cavendish and Ana D. Johnson of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

    PER CURIAM.

    We reverse the summary judgment of foreclosure because Appellee failed to overcome Appellant’s assertion in her answer that Appellee had failed to comply with the condition precedent contained in the mortgage, requiring notice and opportunity to cure. Morrison v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 36 Fla. L. Weekly D1646 (Fla. 5th DCA July 29, 2011); Konsulian v. Busey Bank, N.A., 61 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).

    REVERSED and REMANDED.

    GRIFFIN, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

     

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives