According to AP,  the court on Monday issued a high profile-case order in the matter of Pino v. Bank of New York Mellon. One of the issues in the case is whether there was a fraud on the trial court.

And we all now the original work behind this was none other than Law Offices of David J. Stern, who has recently shut down as of March 31, 2011.

On February 2, 2011 the Florida 4th DCA said

We conclude that this is a question of great public importance, as many, many mortgage foreclosures appear tainted with suspect documents. The defendant has requested a denial of the equitable right to foreclose the mortgage at all. If this is an available remedy as a sanction after a voluntary dismissal, it may dramatically affect the mortgage foreclosure crisis in this State. Accordingly we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as of great public importance

Scribd

Related posts:

1. EXPLOSIVE | FL 4th DCA Sends Foreclosure Fraud Case To Florida Supreme Court PINO v. BANK OF NEW YORK FLORIDA IBANEZ?? DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF...
2. TBO | Court’s stance on foreclosure case could have big impact By William E. Lewis Jr.| Highlands Today Published: February 6, 2011...
3. STOP! You Must Read The Florida Appeal Transcript of PINO v. BANK OF NEW YORK courtesy of IceLegal excerpts: JUDGE POLEN: I’m afraid I’m not...
4. DailyFinance | Will Florida Finally Punish Banks and Lawyers for Foreclosure Document Fraud? Abigail- knocks this OUT THE BALL PARK! Outstanding!! By ABIGAIL...
5. FLORIDA JUDGE DISMISSES FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT FILED BY BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR A SECURITIZED MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SUPREME COURT RULES REQUIRING FORECLOSURE COMPLAINTS TO BE VERIFIED AND FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY ALLEGE CHAIN OF TITLE FROM ORIGINAL LENDER TO FORECLOSING PLAINTIFF May 27, 2010 In an extremely significant ruling, a Florida Circuit...