Excerpt:
IV. CONCLUSION
The Court concludes that Wells Fargo violated TILA and the Sousas were therefore entitled to rescind the Transaction in July 2007. As a result of the violation and the rescission, Wells Fargo’s proof of claim is disallowed and the Sousas are entitled to damages. The Sousas are required to tender to Wells Fargo the actual money lent to them less any finance charges and payments they made to Wells Fargo on the loan. Accordingly, the Court shall grant Claim 1, deny Claim 2, deny as moot Claim 3, grant Claim 4, and grant Claim 5. Furthermore, the Court will grant Count I and Count II of Wells Fargo’s cross-claim against the Ginn Firm. This opinion constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7052. The Court will issue a separate order and judgment consistent with this opinion.
© 2010-12 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
www.StopForeclosureFraud.com
Related posts:
- NJ Appeals Court Reverses SJ “Failed To Have Standing” WELLS FARGO v. SANDRA A. FORD NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION...
- Wells Fargo Loses Bid to Dismiss Fraud Claims: GUSTAVO REYES, ET AL., v. WELLS FARGO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GUSTAVO REYES,...
- California BK Adversary Proceeding KENTON v. Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Florida Default Law Group via: Brian Davies ELIZABETH ANN KENTON, an Individual. Plaintiff, -vs.-...
- OHIO WELLS FARGO QUIET TITLE FAIL | GROVE COURT CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS’ASSN. v. Hartman 2011 Ohio 218 Grove Court Condominium Unit Owners’ Association, Plaintiff-Appellee,...
- Mass. BK Judge Issues “Emergency Preliminary Injunction, Pending Loan Modification Request” CRUZ v. WELLS FARGO In re: JOSE D CRUZ, Chapter 13, Debtor. JOSE D...
