NYSC Gives EMC The Boot For Not Having Standing, Vacates Judgment Of Foreclosure, Sale Due To Retroactive Assignment

Categorized | STOP FORECLOSURE FRAUD

NYSC Gives EMC The Boot For Not Having Standing, Vacates Judgment of Foreclosure, Sale Due To Retroactive Assignment

NYSC Gives EMC The Boot For Not Having Standing, Vacates Judgment of Foreclosure, Sale Due To Retroactive Assignment

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT – QUEENS COUNTY

EMC MORTGAGE CORP.,

v.

JEANETTA TOUSSAINT

excerpt:

In order to commence a foreclosure action, plaintiff must have a legal and equitable interest in the subject mortgage (Wells Fargo Bank v Machine 69 AD3rd 204). Here, the subject mortgage was not assigned until October 2, 2007, which was after the action was commenced on October 1, 2007. A retroactive assignment to September 25, 2007 cannot be used to confer standing upon the foreclosure action commenced prior to the execution of the assignment. (Countrywide Home Loans v Giess 68 AD3rd 709).

<SNIP>

The plaintiff, not being the holder of the assignment at the time the action was commenced, it did not have standing to commence this action. Accordingly, the Court vacates the Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale, which the County Clerks minutes indicate was executed on April 9, 2009 and dismisses the complaint.

Continue below…

Scribd

© 2010-13 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
www.StopForeclosureFraud.com


DONATE

Comments

comments

Related posts:

  1. [NYSC] Standing is a threshold issue, pathway to the courthouse is blocked: WELLS FARGO v. CAMPBELL NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT – QUEENS COUNTY Present: Honorable...
  2. [NYSC] MERS HAS NO INTEREST, STANDING, OFFICER AFFIDAVIT HAS NO PROVATIVE VALUE SUPREME COURT – STATE OF NEW YORK IAS PART 6...
  3. ONEWEST BANK GETS THE BOOT, MERS ASSIGNMENT MAKES NO REFERENCE TO NOTE Judge Murphy deserves an applause for the great job of...
  4. NO MENTION OF DEBT OR NOTE ON ASSIGNMENT, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: WACHOVIA v. VARGAS NYSC SUPREME COURT – STATE OF NEW YORK TRIAL TERM. PART...
  5. NY 2nd Appellate Div. “NO STANDING” US Bank Natl. Assn. v Madero Decided on January 25, 2011 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE...

This post was written by:

- who has written 6658 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Chip Parker, www.jaxlawcenter.com
Jamie Ranney, www.NantucketLaw.pro
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com
Damian Figueroa, South Florida Realtor, Real Estate Agent
Susan Chana Lask, www.appellate-brief.com

Archives