BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE-HOLDERS CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-14, C/O BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DIANE G. CANO AND UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF DIANE G. CANO [MARIO CANO], DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., AS NOMINEE FOR S&L INVESTMENT LENDING, INC., DEFENDANT.
No. 2010AP477.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District IV.
Opinion Filed: January 20, 2011.
Before Vergeront, P.J., Lundsten and Blanchard, JJ.
¶ 1 PER CURIAM.
Diane and Mario Cano appeal a foreclosure judgment. The Canos contend that (1) the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in granting the Bank of New York’s motion to reopen its foreclosure action against the Canos; and (2) the court erred in granting summary judgment to the Bank. We conclude that the court properly reopened the foreclosure action, but that the Bank did not establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Continue below…
[ipaper docId=47539740 access_key=key-2hdlcib85km4810c3itw height=600 width=600 /]
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
BONY/BOA vs Cano Wi a complete frude
If Bank violated REMIC They need to be investigated by the Goverment BONY Vs CANO Wi
Where is our rights or why the system
Lets the Banks and Their lawyers get away with crime ?????????
Why can attorny general office cant investigate this froud ?? REMIC and violation of Harp etc etc
The Bank violated REMIC. Where is the law to protect us BONY vs Cano Wi
We are im BK , our BK Attorney
Has not helpto ask BOA for legal assigment of note ?? We need help Bank commited frude including law firm Attorney created false affadivits
Or false documents including Robosighn
Statue of limitations ran out and bank still having judges and attorneys help them