JAMES KEITH HOOTEN, et al. GERRY RENEE HOOTEN, Plaintiffs,
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendant.
Cause No. 1:09cv491-LG-RHW.
United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division.
January 11, 2011.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LOUIS GUIROLA Jr., District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment [30]. Plaintiffs James Keith and Gerry Renee Hooten initiated this action against their mortgage holder after their home was lost in a tax sale. Ocwen argues (1) it owed no contractual duty to pay the past due taxes, (2) the Statute of Frauds bars any oral modifications, (3) the Hootens released Ocwen from all claims, (4) and the taxes were not escrowed. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions[1] and the relevant legal authority. The motion is denied.
Continue below…
[ipaper docId=47057141 access_key=key-2jjub4cf8tdnhp6iu0fc height=600 width=600 /]
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
If the MERS has no standing in many states how can they have standing in Washington State unless the courts are paid off like the AG’s . Ron Moss