COUNT I:
BREACH OF CONTRACT / BREACH OF DUTY OF GOOD FAITH
AND FAIR DEALING
COUNT II:
PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL, IN THE ALTERNATIVE
COUNT III:
VIOLATION OF CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT,
RCW 19.86.010 ET SEQ
© 2010-13 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved. www.StopForeclosureFraud.com
Related posts:
- NJ CLASS ACTION: Beals v. Bank of America, BAC, LaSalles UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY...
- NY CLASS ACTION: ‘Accelerating Foreclosure, Robo-Signers’ BRIAN COSTIGAN v. Citigroup FIRST COUNT Breach of Contract SECOND COUNT Breach of Covenant...
- 15 Texans File Class action suit against Bank of America By Lani Rosales on July 15, 2010 | AgentGenius.com Here...
- CA CLASS ACTION: FORSTER v. WELLS FARGO, AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY “Fraudulent Modification Practices” FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Breach of Covenant of Good Faith...
- FLORIDA CLASS ACTION: HUBER v. GMAC, ALLY FINANCIAL COUNT I VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF STATE...















One Response to “WA STATE CLASS ACTION: “HAMP MODIFICATIONS” SOPER v. BANK OF AMERICA”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kevin W. Hardin, DinSFLA. DinSFLA said: WA STATE CLASS ACTION: “HAMP MODIFICATIONS” SOPER v. BANK OF AMERICA http://goo.gl/fb/1PmHl [...]