UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

In re JOSHUA & STEPHANIE MITCHELL)

Case No. BK-S-07-16226-LBR ) Chapter 7 )
Debtor(s).)

Excerpt:

In Hawkins the motion was brought by MERS “solely as nominee for Fremont Investment
& Loan, its successors and/or assigns.” However, in his affidavit at ¶ 6, Victor Parisi states 45 46
that the beneficial ownership interest in the Hawkins note was sold by Fremont Investment &
Loan and ownership was transferred by endorsement and delivery. While the affidavit goes on to
the say that MERS was a holder at the time the motion was filed, it is obvious that MERS has no
rights to bring the motion as nominee of Fremont given that Fremont no longer had any interest
in the note.

Scribd

Related posts:

1. VICTOR PARISI ROBO-SIGNER CALLED OUT BY [NYSC] JUDGE LAURA JACOBSON: Equity One v. James 2006 (1) At an I AS Term, Part 2 1 of the...
2. VICTOR PARISI ROBO-SIGNER CALLED OUT BY [NYSC] JUDGE JEFFREY ARLEN SPINNER: JPMORGAN v. MUNOZ 2009 (3) SUPREME COURT – STATE OF NEW YORK I.A.S. PART 21...
3. VICTOR PARISI ROBO-SIGNER CALLED OUT BY [NYSC] JUDGE ARTHUR SCHACK: HSBC Bank USA v. Perboo 2008 (2) New York Supreme Court, Kings County HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL...
4. NYSC Judge Karen V. Murphy Calls Out Robo-Signer Margaret Dalton, EMC, MERS SUPREME COURT – STATE OF NEW YORK Index No. 10123/09...
5. Robo-Signer Called Out in Ohio by Attorney General Cordray The Honorable Judge County Court of Common Pleas Re: Foreclosure...