MERS BIFURCATED THE NOTE AND MORTGAGE, NOW THERE IS TROUBLE! - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

MERS BIFURCATED THE NOTE AND MORTGAGE, NOW THERE IS TROUBLE!

MERS BIFURCATED THE NOTE AND MORTGAGE, NOW THERE IS TROUBLE!

DinSFLA

This is what we have been saying from day 1. By using MERS they have split the Note and Mortgage= “Bifurcate”.

By not assigning from the Originator to the Sponsor this is where lies the problem. Instead they transferred the notes to the Trusts in ___________________________ name? Which leaves this a Bearer instrument.

So by maintaining the notes in a bearer name, each step must have been documented and assigned according to the PSA. If these were securitized, question is did the true sale ever happen? Bottom Line.

Delivery & Acceptance Must Happen


Nearly all Pooling and Servicing Agreements require that On the Closing Date, the Purchaser will assign to the Trustee pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement all of its right, title and interest in and to the Mortgage Loans and its rights under this Agreement (to the extent set forth in Section 15), and the Trustee shall succeed to such right, title and interest in and to the Mortgage Loans and the Purchaser’s rights under this Agreement (to the extent set forth in Section 15). Also, an Assignment of Mortgage must accompany each note and this almost never happens.

We believe nearly every single loan transferred was transferred to the Trust in blank name. That is to say the actual loans were apparently not, as of either the cut-off or closing dates, assigned to the Trust as required by the PSA.

Quite the can of worms. Anyone who says that the banks will fix all this in a few months is seriously delusional.

I am not a pro, finance guru and that is why there is a comment section below. But I do have common sense and I smell scam.

Vanilla, chocolate, strawberry …each state is different. Eliminate Electronic Recordings PERIOD!

One of the best videos I have seen on this crisis.

MORTGAGE POOL SECURITIZATION CHART

RELATED LINKS:

SECURITIZATION 101

.

MERS 101

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11487 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

5 Responses to “MERS BIFURCATED THE NOTE AND MORTGAGE, NOW THERE IS TROUBLE!”

  1. Peter says:

    So how does the underwriter fit in, when there’s an agreement that they sold the mortgages to an Underwriter along with all if the interest, title, etc? Great graphic!

  2. GLORIA IRIS TORRES says:

    Delivery & Acceptance Must Happen

    THANKS FOR THE GRAPHIC IT TELLS IT ALL

  3. Terry says:

    Georgia says it is OK to bifurcate the Note from the Security Deed which is all that is needed to foreclose. Would love to know how you interpret “You v Chase, May 2013” since it makes it even easier for nonjudicial foreclosures. http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ga-supreme-court/1631643.html The GA Sup. Court says that Article 3 of UCC does not apply to GA law.

  4. Serena May says:

    They thought the security was there they underwrote on assumption

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kevin W. Hardin and kim thomas, DinSFLA. DinSFLA said: MERS BIFURCATED THE NOTE AND MORTGAGE, NOW THERE IS TROUBLE! http://goo.gl/fb/25eAG […]


Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives

Please Support Me!







Write your comment within 199 characters.

All Of These Are Troll Comments