H.R. 3808: Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

H.R. 3808: Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act

H.R. 3808: Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act

H.R.3808

One Hundred Eleventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

An Act

To require any Federal or State court to recognize any notarization made by a notary public licensed by a State other than the State where the court is located when such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010’.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF NOTARIZATIONS IN FEDERAL COURTS.

Each Federal court shall recognize any lawful notarization made by a notary public licensed or commissioned under the laws of a State other than the State where the Federal court is located if–

(1) such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce; and

(2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary public’s authority, is used in the notarization; or

(B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal information is securely attached to, or logically associated with, the electronic record so as to render the record tamper-resistant.

SEC. 3. RECOGNITION OF NOTARIZATIONS IN STATE COURTS.

Each court that operates under the jurisdiction of a State shall recognize any lawful notarization made by a notary public licensed or commissioned under the laws of a State other than the State where the court is located if–

(1) such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce; and

(2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary public’s authority, is used in the notarization; or

(B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal information is securely attached to, or logically associated with, the electronic record so as to render the record tamper-resistant.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) ELECTRONIC RECORD- The term ‘electronic record’ has the meaning given that term in section 106 of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7006).

(2) LOGICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH- Seal information is ‘logically associated with’ an electronic record if the seal information is securely bound to the electronic record in such a manner as to make it impracticable to falsify or alter, without detection, either the record or the seal information.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.

[ipaper docId=38867914 access_key=key-1yqasqqr7mxbrxa5un47 height=600 width=600 /]
© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11555 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

3 Responses to “H.R. 3808: Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act”

  1. Terrified says:

    We have been tricked! Sen. Harry Reid didn’t actually adjourn the U.S. Senate. Check the Senate Calendar!

    The purported “Pocket Veto” of the Digital Robo-Signing Act was a deceitful act to pretend to veto this bill while actually allowing it to become law.

    Under Article I, Section 7, of the Constitution, a Pocket Veto is effective when Congress is adjourned.

    THE JOKE IS ON US!

    DEMAND THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA ACTUALLY VETO THIS BILL AND/OR THAT SEN. HARRY REID IMMEDIATELY ADJOURN THE U.S. SENATE. OTHERWISE, THE DIGITAL ROBO-SIGNING ACT BECOMES LAW TOMORROW!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by i8 wamu, DinSFLA. DinSFLA said: H.R. 3808: Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act http://goo.gl/fb/uIhQA […]

  2. […] H.R. 3808: Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act (2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary public's authority, is used in the notarization; or. (B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal information is securely attached to, or logically associated with, the electronic record . The purported “Pocket Veto” of the Digital Robo-Signing Act was a deceitful act to pretend to veto this bill while actually allowing it to become law. Under Article I, Section 7, of the Constitution, a Pocket Veto is effective when . […]


Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives