WHERE’S THE NOTE, WHO’S THE HOLDER | ENFORCEMENT OF PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY REAL ESTATE - FORECLOSURE FRAUD

WHERE’S THE NOTE, WHO’S THE HOLDER | ENFORCEMENT OF PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY REAL ESTATE

WHERE’S THE NOTE, WHO’S THE HOLDER | ENFORCEMENT OF PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY REAL ESTATE

WHERE’S THE NOTE, WHO’S THE HOLDER

INTRODUCTION

In an era where a very large portion of mortgage obligations have been securitized, by assignment to a trust indenture trustee, with the resulting pool of assets being then sold as mortgage backed securities, foreclosure becomes an interesting exercise, particularly where judicial process is involved.  We are all familiar with the securitization process.  The steps, if not the process, is simple.  A borrower goes to a mortgage lender.  The lender finances the purchase of real estate.  The borrower signs a note and mortgage or deed of trust.  The original lender sells the note and assigns the mortgage to an entity that securitizes the note by combining the note with hundreds or thousands of similar obligation to create a package of mortgage backed securities, which are then sold to investors.

Unfortunately, unless you represent borrowers, the vast flow of notes into the maw of the securitization industry meant that a lot of mistakes were made.  When the borrower defaults, the party seeking to enforce the obligation and foreclose on the underlying collateral sometimes cannot find the note.  A lawyer sophisticated in this area has speculated to one of the authors that perhaps a third of the notes “securitized” have been lost or destroyed.  The cases we are going to look at reflect the stark fact that the unnamed source’s speculation may be well-founded.

UCC SECTION 3-309

If the issue were as simple as a missing note, UCC §3-309 would provide a simple solution.  A person entitled to enforce an instrument which has been lost, destroyed or stolen may enforce the instrument.  If the court is concerned that some third party may show up and attempt to enforce the instrument against the payee, it may order adequate protection.  But, and however, a person seeking to enforce a missing instrument must be a person entitled to enforce the instrument, and that person must prove the instrument’s terms and that person’s right to enforce the instrument.  §3-309 (a)(1) & (b).

continue below…

[ipaper docId=34639366 access_key=key-16iibafykexw94r9ex7k height=600 width=600 /]

More on….MERS

© 2010-19 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 11535 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “WHERE’S THE NOTE, WHO’S THE HOLDER | ENFORCEMENT OF PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY REAL ESTATE”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by DinSFLA, DinSFLA. DinSFLA said: WHERE'S THE NOTE, WHO'S THE HOLDER | ENFORCEMENT OF PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY REAL ESTATE http://bit.ly/9Blgoc […]


Leave a Reply

Advert

Archives