No Summary Judgment in This Foreclosure Action

No Summary Judgment in This Foreclosure Action

No Summary Judgment in This Foreclosure Action

THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST
COMPANY, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR
CHASEFLEX TRUST SERIES 2007-3,

-vs-

DAVID J. MOSQUERA; ELIZABETH
MOSQUERA;

ICE LEGAL does it again…

Thank you to Lynn Szymoniak for her Expert Witness Affidavit used in this foreclosure case!

[ipaper docId=34155185 access_key=key-npkyn8uzzco86kisdz2 height=600 width=600 /]


© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8610 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

One Response to “No Summary Judgment in This Foreclosure Action”

  1. Stupendous Man - Defender of Liberty - Foe of Tyranny says:

    I read through this transcript. I was struck by what seemed to be rule and evidentiary issues on the part of the borrowers attorney. I’m definitely “pro-borrower,” but it looks like the court could have easily ruled for plaintiff as a result of these issues.

    My opinion is that our system is not geared towards, or based in, finding the truth and the facts. Instead it is based on adherence to the rules. Violate the rules and it doesn’t matter what the facts are – you won’t be allowed to present them to the court.

    I don’t believe it is possible to know the rules TOO well. In fact, if you know them better than opposing counsel you might just beat ’em with the rules (of course, most defendants in foreclosures also have the truth and facts on their side also).

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com

Archives