THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST
COMPANY, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR
CHASEFLEX TRUST SERIES 2007-3,
-vs-
DAVID J. MOSQUERA; ELIZABETH
MOSQUERA;
ICE LEGAL does it again…
Thank you to Lynn Szymoniak for her Expert Witness Affidavit used in this foreclosure case!
Related posts:
- FL 4th DCA FINAL SUMMARY FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT REVERSED!! LAZURAN vs. CitiMortgage Inc, Law Offices of David J. Stern PA et al When is someone going to really sanction these characters?? Time...
- OVERRULED!!! Florida Judge Reverses His own Summary Judgment Order! Lets See if the END IS NEAR for these FRAUD...
- Judge reversed his own ruling that had granted summary judgment to GMAC Mortgage (DAVID J. STERN) My am news could never arrive too early from one...
- GMAC v Visicaro Case No 07013084CI: florida judge reverses himself: applies basic rules of evidence and overturns his own order granting motion for summary judgment THIS IS WORTH REPEATING OVER AND OVER!!!! From: Neil Garfield...
- MOTION FOR DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT – FORECLOSURE CONSEQUENCES Thank you Richard Zaretsky, Esq., for putting this out for...
I read through this transcript. I was struck by what seemed to be rule and evidentiary issues on the part of the borrowers attorney. I’m definitely “pro-borrower,” but it looks like the court could have easily ruled for plaintiff as a result of these issues.
My opinion is that our system is not geared towards, or based in, finding the truth and the facts. Instead it is based on adherence to the rules. Violate the rules and it doesn’t matter what the facts are – you won’t be allowed to present them to the court.
I don’t believe it is possible to know the rules TOO well. In fact, if you know them better than opposing counsel you might just beat ‘em with the rules (of course, most defendants in foreclosures also have the truth and facts on their side also).