MERS, NOT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, NOT A FOREIGN BANK MAKING MORTGAGES!

CALIFORNIA Decisions Against MERS, NOT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, NOT A FOREIGN BANK MAKING MORTGAGES!

CALIFORNIA Decisions Against MERS, NOT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, NOT A FOREIGN BANK MAKING MORTGAGES!

From B.DaviesMd6605

MERS IS LOOSING BIG TIME. THEY ARE A SCAM PRODUCED TO CHEAT AMERICANS AND THOSE WHO WORK IN REAL ESTATE RECORDS FROM MILLIONS OF DOLLARS BY NOT DOING ASSIGNMENTS. THIS FACILITATED CORRUPTION AND PREDATORY LENDING BY BUILDERS, THEIR LENDERS, AND OTHERS., THIS NEEDS TO END, WE WILL MAKE SURE IT DOES. THOSE PREDATORY ATTORNEYS WHO KNOW THIS FRAUD WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE. THE DOJ IS INVESTIGATING AND THE END WILL COME.

[ipaper docId=31736973 access_key=key-201b6nhrr2kyk67eb15y height=600 width=600 /]

© 2010-17 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.



Comments

comments

This post was written by:

- who has written 8641 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

4 Responses to “CALIFORNIA Decisions Against MERS, NOT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, NOT A FOREIGN BANK MAKING MORTGAGES!”

  1. Fighting MERS in CA says:

    MAJOR UPDATE:

    On July 21, 2010 MERS registered with the California Secretary of State.
    MERS registration in California is NOT retroactive until its complete for the following reasons:
    1. As a result of MERS intentional failure from obtaining a certificate of qualification from the California Secretary of State as a “Beneficiary”, including filing returns and paying taxes, MERS is not allowed the right to defend a lawsuit when named as or defending its actions in a “Beneficiary” capacity, pursuant to California Revenue & Taxation Code Section §§ 23301, 23301.6, 23304.1.

    “A suspended corporation is not allowed to exercise the powers and privileges of a corporation in good standing, including the right to sue or defend a lawsuit while its taxes remain unpaid”
    PERFORMANCE PLASTERING v. RICHMOND AM. HOMES, 153 Cal.App.4th 659 (2007) 63 Cal.Rptr.3d 537

    2. MERS must first produce a Certificate of Relief from Voidability for the time prior to July 21, 2010, California Revenue & Tax Code 23305.1 and file with this Superior Court Clerk receipt of payment to the California Secretary of State for taxes and penalties, California Corporations Code §2203(c).

    “UMML qualified to transact intrastate business, but failed to pay the necessary fees, penalties and taxes. The trial court correctly dismissed the complaint without prejudice.”
    United Medical Management Ltd. v. Gatto, 49 Cal. App. 4th 1732 – Cal: Court of Appeals, 2nd Appellate

    3. MERS will very likely cite one of these two cases:
    United Medical Management Ltd. v. Gatto 49 Cal.App.4th 1732 (1996),
    or an unpublished case as of 10/18/2010 Perlas v. Mortgage Elec. Registration Systems, Inc., 2010 WL 3079262 * 7

    Both of which are based upon this case:
    “A nonqualified corporation subject to a misdemeanor prosecution and on conviction to a heavy fine for doing business without complying with the law, is permitted to qualify, be restored to full legal competency and have its prior transactions given full effect.” (Tucker v. Cave Springs Min. Corp. (1934) 139 Cal. App. 213, 217 [33 P.2d 871].

    So demand the filing of receipts and that Certificat of Relief from Voidability!

    Get more flaws at https://sites.google.com/site/mersfatalflawsincalifornia/home

    mersfatalflaws@gmail.com

  2. usjustice4all says:

    There is a copy of the Letter from the State Regarding MERS registration on Scibb

  3. Tara says:

    We had CW loan, then sold to BofA..then HAMP loan mod, then loan sold to Nationstar Mortgage. We are now in forclosure and a sale date on our home of 3/17/16. Scared and need help. Thanks.

  4. Izz says:

    @Tara

    Is your loan a REMIC trust? Because it’s likely they can’t do a loan mod and know it. So they instead use the mod as an excuse to stall you while they work on foreclosure behind your back. You need to get everything they claim they are doing in writing. If they won’t do that then you know.

    I can only tell you what I would do, which is demand the money trail to whom they say you owe. By law you have to know with whom you are dealing and a contract isn’t valid if there was another party you don’t know and wasn’t disclosed to you. The point of pushing to get the money trail is to prove what it is they are actually hiding from you, which is actually the truth. The person funded who funded the money is you!

    If they do provide the trail they’re screwed and If they don’t they’re screwed too, because that would show they are hiding who the real party from you. If they won’t allow you to follow the money then how can you know the person that contracted with you, as required by law. Basic contract law 101.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Advertise your business on StopForeclosureFraud.com

Archives