From BMcDonald

This is a bankruptcy case in which IndyMac Bank wanted relief of stay so they could proceed with a foreclosure. The judge ordered them to produce the original note and deed, which they did but ended up having to admit they didn’t own them. This judge Bufford goes into great detail about the issues of “party in interest” and “real party in interest” and who has the right to foreclose. Only a party with a real investment in the property has a right to collect on the debt.

[scribd id=28524908 key=key-15d3p0a4ew0xlkthl48k mode=list]

Related posts:

1. Davies v. NDEX WEST LLC, Uamc-uamcc Demurrers to first amended complaint- moot since Second Amended was filed This is moot however, this is the response most lenders...
2. Davies v. Ndex West Llc, Plaintiff Notice to Court–refusal to Comply With Discovery Plaintiff is having difficulty in acquiring any documents with the...
3. Indymac Federal Bank Fsb V. Israel A. Machado : Deposition of Erica Johnson-Seck Indymac Federal Bank Fsb Vs. Israel a. Machado : In...
4. SEC Inspector General to Launch Investigation on Timing of GOLDMAN SACHS Charges…   [scribd id=30451567 key=key-xbw9prkbbkygfzr6o18 mode=list]...
5. Foreclosure Crisis: New Center for Court Innovation paper reviews responses to mortgage fraud, foreclosure and abandoned property. New Center for Court Innovation paper reviews responses to mortgage...