Archive | April 17th, 2010
Posted on 17 April 2010. Tags: chip brian, downtrend alert, downward momentum, lender processing services, LPS, smartrend, stock
Posted on 04/17/10 at 2:00pm by Chip Brian
SmarTrend identified a Downtrend for Lender Processing Services (NYSE: LPS) on March 31, 2010 at $38.26. In approximately 2 weeks, Lender Processing Services has returned 3.3% as of today’s recent price of $36.99.
Lender
Processing Services is currently below its 50-day moving average of $38.94 and below its 200-day moving average of $37.98. Look for these moving averages
to decline to confirm the company’s downward momentum.
SmarTrend will continue to scan these moving averages and a number of other proprietary indicators for any changes in momentum for shares of Lender Processing Services.
Write to Chip Brian at cbrian@tradethetrend.com
Posted in Lender Processing Services Inc., LPS
Posted on 17 April 2010. Tags: 10b-5, 15 U.S.C. §77q(a), 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5, 360, ABACUS 2007-AC1, ACA, ACA Management LLC ("ACA"), anderson cooper, cdo, cnn, dinsfla, dinsfls, discovery, Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, Fabrice Tourre, flip book, fraud, fraud digest, goldman sachs, HERS, investment banks, Lynn Szymoniak ESQ, marketing material, material misstatements and omissions, matt taibbi, offering memorandum, Paulson & Co. Inc. ("Paulson"), portfolio, resecuritized CDO market, residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"), rmbs, rolling stone, sec, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, subprime, term sheet, Tourre
The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beb2jBijo-s]
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsRtjYWNZQ8]
TYX91101 Taibbi’s excellent articles alone are worth the price of the magazine. There have been several. He’s doing a commendable? job of putting Wall Street monkey business into the public consciousness. You never get that kind of reporting on CNBC. Great work Matt! 6 hours ago
overseachininadoll Those who greatly benefited from the? crash must hand back the money. (Paulson company) 14 hours ago
Relugus Alot more than the sycophantic financial journalists who kiss Wall Street’s ass.? Wall Street has been screwing people, stealing taxpayers money, stealing wealth from the people, for decades. People are slowly waking up to what Wall Street is, a bunch of criminals and gangsters. 18 hours ago
Related Articles:
Posted in concealment, conspiracy, corruption, goldman sachs, hank paulson, john paulson, matt taibbi
Posted on 17 April 2010. Tags: 4closurefraud, bank fraud, carol asbury, Denise Richardson, dinsfla, fight the banks, foreclosure, foreclosure defense, foreclosure fraud, Foreclosure Hamlet, freedom ride, hb 1523, hb1523, huffington post, ice legal, lisa epstein, matt weidner, Michael Redman, nonjudicial, Nonjudicial Foreclosure Act for Nonhomestead Properties, Rally in Tally, Richard Zombeck, save my home, sb 2270, tallahassee, wall street fraud, wrongful foreclosure

Posted: April 17, 2010 12:30 PM
In a time when you can stroll over to the computer and rattle off an e-mail to your elected official because you think your taxes are too high or leave an anonymous comment on a blog or article voicing your disapproval with a particular reporter, it would seem that the days of face-to-face action and rallies are unfortunately a thing of the past.Not for a group of activists in Florida heading to the Capitol in Tallahassee on Wednesday, April 21.
Michael Redman (4closureFraud), and Lisa Epstein (Foreclosure Hamlet), in an effort to convince Florida legislators to listen to their constituents, are organizing a transport to the capital. An old fashion road trip of attorneys, advocates, and homeowners. Transportation is being organized and buses will be available from key areas throughout Florida and along major roadways. Redman and Epstein had initially dipped into their own pockets to charter buses for the event.
As of April 16th, according to Redman’s blog, in a Friday post,
“Team Ice in West Palm has sponsored their bus and now one of Pinellas County’s toughest foreclosure fighters has generously agreed to sponsor a bus to make sure any attorney and homeowner who wants to go to Tallahassee and make his or her voice heard has the opportunity to get up there and meet face to face.”
“One of the most inspiring things about all of this is seeing how the defense attorneys are all throwing their time, talent and treasure into this fight. We all share our ideas, insight and experience because doing so serves the interests of not just our clients but those folks out there who cannot afford an attorney and it especially serves the Constitution we took an oath to protect and the judiciary we respect,”
The most important piece of legislation the group was trying to stop was a push by bankers to change the way Florida handles foreclosures. Florida currently, and always has had Judicial foreclosures. The bank’s proposed legislation would have allowed banks to foreclose on Florida homes without going to court. According to Matt Weidner, a Florida attorney, the bill for now appears to have been stopped in the House, but the Senate will meet next week and according to an old Florida saying, “No one’s safe while the legislature is in session.”
A non-judicial foreclosure would mean that, “you the homeowner won’t automatically get your day in court if your lender tries to take your house away. The way it works right now is the lender is required by law to file a civil lawsuit against you in order to foreclose. You then have to answer it. If you don’t answer it or don’t show up to court, the judge issues a summary judgment against you. In a non-judicial foreclosure everything is done administratively and your right to due process is compromised and you have to beg for your day in court,” as explained by Steve Dibert of MFI-Miami.
Although the bill appears to have died, and the bankers appear to have conceded, this motivated band of advocates doesn’t want to leave anything to chance.
An e-mail from Weidner reads:
As Mark Twain said, ‘News of My death was greatly exaggerated.’ Although the legislation appears to have died, the passion and concern that its introduction incited has only increased with word of its demise. Tapping into broad based anxiety and concern felt by homeowners all across Florida, the group has turned its focus from defeating this legislation to demanding legislation that will increase protections for Florida homeowners. Talk about turning the tables. They are meeting with Senator Mark Aronberg and Rep. Darren Soto who introduced a “Homeowner’s Bill of Rights“. They’re asking that this legislation be resurrected… at the very least they want to make sure their legislators are fully aware of their concerns and the problems they’re facing.
According to Weidner’s press release,
“The response from legislators to this movement has been awe-inspiring. Our leaders in Washington may have trouble hearing the voices of their people, but the leaders who represent us in Tallahassee hear the voice of the people loud and clear! Already leaders from both houses have graciously agreed to meet with their voters, we’re confident many more will agree to meet with us when we arrive.”
Michael Moore spoke of the apathy and lack of action he witnessed despite his tireless work drawing attention to key issues affecting millions of Americans.
“Two years ago, I tried to get the health-care debate going, and it did eventually, and now where are we? We may not even have it. What am I supposed to do at a certain point?, ” Moore said in an 2009 Toronto press conference.
I wrote about that similar frustration with apathy in “Where are the Screaming Liberals?,” back in September 2009.
It’s refreshing and inspiring to think that may be changing.
Denise Richardson (givemebackmycredit.com) posted the following from Lisa Epstein on her blog:
This is not just for homeowners!We are ALL reduced by the actions behind the mortgage frauds and scams. Tenants! Anyone who relies on any public service funded by our now shrunken tax revenues! Anyone owning any property at all, fully paid off or not. Any business owner! Unemployed family members! Credit card/bank account fees victims! Those with drained 401Ks and college savings accounts!
We will be heard as was the Florida Bankers Association on their own “Capitol Day” on March 10, 2010. Florida Bankers, guess what? You wanted a “Taste of Florida”? You are gonna get one! We are having our own “Capitol Day”! But our collective voices will be a harmony; louder, clearer, unwavering, and with a foundation firmly planted in the historical roots of our country as a nation for WE, THE PEOPLE!
Bankers and other stealth foreclosing entities, listen up! We are NOT boobs, chumps, doormats, dupes, easy marks, fools, goats, gulls, patsies, pigeons, pushovers, saps, scapegoats, schmucks, sitting ducks, stooges, suckers, victims, or weaklings, And we most certainly are not “deadbeats”!
To find out more about the rally and let them know you’ll be along for the ride, see Redman’s site at 4closurefraud.org or Weidner’s blog for more information.


Posted in foreclosure fraud, foreclosure mills
Posted on 17 April 2010. Tags: 10b-5, 15 U.S.C. §77q(a), 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5, ABACUS 2007-AC1, ACA, ACA Management LLC ("ACA"), cdo, dinsfls, discovery, Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, Fabrice Tourre, flip book, fraud, fraud digest, goldman sachs, HERS, investment banks, Lynn Szymoniak ESQ, marketing material, material misstatements and omissions, offering memorandum, Paulson & Co. Inc. ("Paulson"), portfolio, resecuritized CDO market, residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"), rmbs, sec, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, subprime, term sheet, Tourre
Securities and Investments
Abacus 2007-AC1
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Fabrice Tourre
Action Date: April 16, 2010
Location: New York, NY

On April 16, 2010, the SEC filed securities fraud charges against Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“GS&Co”) and a GS&Co employee, Fabrice Tourre (“Tourre”), for making material misstatements and omissions in connection with a collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) GS&Co made and marketed to investors. ABACUS 2007-AC1, a mortgage-backed trust, was tied to the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities. Abacus was made and marketed in early 2007 when the United States housing market was beginning to show signs of distress. Mortgage-backed trusts like ABACUS 2007-AC1 contributed to the financial crisis. According to the Commission’s complaint, the marketing materials for ABACUS 2007-AC1 all represented that the reference portfolio of RMBS underlying the CDO was selected by ACA Management LLC (“ACA”), a third party with expertise in analyzing credit risk in RMBS. Undisclosed in the marketing materials and unbeknownst to investors, a large hedge fund, Paulson & Co. Inc. (“Paulson”), with economic interests directly adverse to investors in the ABACUS 2007-AC1 CDO played a significant role in the portfolio selection process. After participating in the selection of the reference portfolio, Paulson effectively shorted the RMBS portfolio it helped select by entering into credit default swaps (“CDS”) with GS&Co to buy protection on specific layers of the ABACUS 2007-AC1 capital structure. Given its financial short interest, Paulson had an economic incentive to choose RMBS that it expected to experience credit events in the near future. GS&Co did not disclose Paulson’s adverse economic interest or its role in the portfolio selection process in the term sheet, flip book, offering memorandum or other marketing materials. The Commission alleges that Tourre was principally responsible for ABACUS 2007-AC1. According to the Commission’s complaint, Tourre devised the transaction, prepared the marketing materials and communicated directly with investors. Tourre is alleged to have known of Paulson’s undisclosed short interest and its role in the collateral selection process. He is also alleged to have misled ACA into believing that Paulson invested approximately $200 million in the equity of ABACUS 2007-AC1 (a long position) and, accordingly, that Paulson’s interests in the collateral section process were aligned with ACA’s when in reality Paulson’s interests were sharply conflicting. The deal closed on April 26, 2007. Paulson paid GS&Co approximately $15 million for structuring and marketing ABACUS 2007-AC1. By October 24, 2007, 83% of the RMBS in the ABACUS 2007-AC1 portfolio had been downgraded and 17% was on negative watch. By January 29, 2008, 99% of the portfolio had allegedly been downgraded. Investors in the liabilities of ABACUS 2007-AC1 are alleged to have lost over $1 billion. Paulson’s opposite CDS positions yielded a profit of approximately $1 billion. The Commission’s complaint, which was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, charges GS&Co and Tourre with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §77q(a), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5. The Commission seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest and civil penalties from both defendants.
Posted in concealment, conspiracy, corruption, FED FRAUD, federal reserve board, fraud digest, goldman sachs, Lynn Szymoniak ESQ, S.E.C., scam
Posted on 17 April 2010. Tags: appeal foreclosure, assignment, assignment of mortgage fraud, bank fraud, bogus, bogus assignments, brittany snow, CARRICK MOLLENKAMP, caveat emptor, cdo, cds, christina allen, Christina Allen; Scott Anderson; Brent Bagley; China Brown; Eric Friedman; Linda Green; Ely Harless; Korell Harp; Laura Hescott; Erica Johnson-Seck; Dennis Kirkpatrick; Topako Love; Jessica Ohde; Shel, Christina Huang, clouded title, conspiracy, criminal, Cynthia Kouril, dinsfla, DOCX, eric tate, erica johnson seck, FIS, foreclosure, foreclosure fraud, foreclosure mill, forgery, fraud, fraud digest, Freddie Mac, jessica ohde, kor, Korell Harp, laura hescott, lender processing services, linda green, livinglies, LPS, Lynn Szymoniak ESQ, MERS, mortgage, mortgage electronic registration system, Mortgage Fraud, pat kingston, produce the note, recordings, The Wall Street Journal, title defect, Tywanna Thomas, wrongful foreclosure
All over the US there is mass title defects that have been created to our homes…we are being evicted and titles to our stolen homes are being fabricated by means of Forgery/FRAUD! If these homes have been stolen from us…we have the right to claim them back! Let the unsuspecting homeowner who buys your home that it was fraudulently taken from you! What happens when your car is stolen and reclaimed? It goes back to it’s owner!
Stop by, say hello to the new owner of your stolen home and welcome them to the bogus neighborhood! Oh make sure to show some hospitality and bring them a gift…Umm your Foreclosure Mill Docs!
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ9p6ZFquNY]


Posted in concealment, conspiracy, corruption, foreclosure fraud, foreclosure mills, robo signer, robo signers, roger stotts
Posted on 17 April 2010. Tags: AMIR EFRATI, cease to exist, expose, foreclosure fraud, foreclosure mill, illegal foreclosures, wsj
ISO Mills that are “Illegally Foreclosing” across America! Do your part help raise EXPOSURE. We are being heard!
Annihilate (in a peaceful, legal manner):
1 a : to cause to be of no effect : nullify b : to destroy the substance or force of
2 : to regard as of no consequence
3 : to cause to cease to exist
We are not a branch,
a single leaf,
Together WE can form a FOREST!
Related Article:
Judge Bashes Bank in Foreclosure Case: The Wall Street Journal

Posted in concealment, conspiracy, corruption, foreclosure fraud, foreclosure mills, forensic mortgage investigation audit, scam
Posted on 17 April 2010. Tags: affidavit, AMIR EFRATI, Anthony Rondolino, appeal foreclosure, bank fraud, bankruptcy, clouded title, conspiracy, corruption, criminal, debbie visicaro, dinsfla, djsp enterprises, fight the banks, foreclosure, foreclosure defense, foreclosure fraud, forgery, fraud, Gmac Mortgage, judge lynn tepper, law offices of david J. stern plantation florida 33324, livinglies, MERS, Mike Wasylik, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., Mortgage Fraud, motion to dismiss, OVERRULED, pasco county, produce the note, summary judgment, The Wall Street Journal, Visicaro, wrongful foreclosure
Now you know when the Law Offices of David J. Stern reaches the Wall Street Journal, we certainly are getting our point A C R O S S! Thank You AMIR!
LAW APRIL 16, 2010, 11:20 P.M. ET
A Florida state-court judge, in a rare ruling, said a major national bank perpetrated a “fraud” in a foreclosure lawsuit, raising questions about how banks are attempting to claim homes from borrowers in default.
The ruling, made last month in Pasco County, Fla., comes amid increased scrutiny of foreclosures by the prosecutors and judges in regions hurt by the recession. Judges have said in hearings they are increasingly concerned that banks are attempting to seize properties they don’t own.
Case Documents
Cases handled by the Law Offices of David Stern
The Florida case began in December 2007 when U.S. Bank N.A. sued a homeowner, Ernest E. Harpster, after he defaulted on a $190,000 loan he received in January of that year.
The Law Offices of David J. Stern, which represented the bank, prepared a document called an “assignment of mortgage” showing that the bank received ownership of the mortgage in December 2007. The document was dated December 2007.
But after investigating the matter, Circuit Court Judge Lynn Tepper ruled that the document couldn’t have been prepared until 2008. Thus, she ruled, the bank couldn’t prove it owned the mortgage at the time the suit was filed.
The document filed by the plaintiff, Judge Tepper wrote last month, “did not exist at the time of the filing of this action…was subsequently created and…fraudulently backdated, in a purposeful, intentional effort to mislead.” She dismissed the case.
Forrest McSurdy, a lawyer at the David Stern firm that handled the U.S. Bank case, said the mistake was due to “carelessness.” The mortgage document was initially prepared and signed in 2007 but wasn’t notarized until months later, he said. After discovering similar problems in other foreclosure cases, he said, the firm voluntarily withdrew the suits and later re-filed them using appropriate documents.
“Judges get in a whirl about technicalities because the courts are overwhelmed,” he said. “The merits of the cases are the same: people aren’t paying their mortgages.”
Steve Dale, a spokesman for U.S. Bank, said the company played a passive role in the matter because it represents investors who own a mortgage-securities trust that includes the Harpster loan. He said a division of Wells Fargo & Co., which collected payments from Mr. Harpster, initiated the foreclosure on behalf of the investors.
Wells Fargo said in a statement it “does not condone, accept, nor instruct counsel to take actions such as those taken in this case.” The company said it was “troubled” by the “conclusions the Court found as to the actions of this foreclosure attorney. We will review these circumstances closely and take appropriate action as necessary.”
Since the housing crisis began several years ago, judges across the U.S. have found that documents submitted by banks to support foreclosure claims were wrong. Mistakes by banks and their representatives have also led to an ongoing federal criminal probe in Florida.
Some of the problems stem from the difficulty banks face in proving they own the loans, thanks to the complexity of the mortgage market.
The Florida ruling against U.S. Bank was also a critique of law firms that handle foreclosure cases on behalf of banks, dubbed “foreclosure mills.”
Lawyers operating foreclosure mills often are paid based on the volume of cases they complete. Some receive $1,000 per case, court records show. Firms compete for business in part based on how quickly they can foreclose. The David Stern firm had about 900 employees as of last year, court records show.
“The pure volume of foreclosures has a tendency perhaps to encourage sloppiness, boilerplate paperwork or a lack of thoroughness” by attorneys for banks, said Judge Tepper of Florida, in an interview. The deluge of foreclosures makes the process “fraught with potential for fraud,” she said.
At an unrelated hearing in a separate matter last week, Anthony Rondolino, a state-court judge in St. Petersburg, Fla., said that an affidavit submitted by the David Stern law firm on behalf of GMAC Mortgage LLC in a foreclosure case wasn’t necessarily sufficient to establish that GMAC was the owner of the mortgage.
“I don’t have any confidence that any of the documents the Court’s receiving on these mass foreclosures are valid,” the judge said at the hearing.
A spokesman for GMAC declined to comment and a lawyer at the David Stern firm declined to comment.
Write to Amir Efrati at amir.efrati@wsj.com
Related Articles
U.S. Probes Foreclosure-Data Provider
4/3/2010
Two Different Plaintiffs Claim to Own Same Mortgage
11/14/2008
Some Judges Stiffen Foreclosure Standards
7/26/2008
The Court House: How One Family Fought Foreclosure
11/28/2007
Judges Tackle “Foreclosure Mills”
11/30/2007
Wells Fargo Is Sanctioned For Role in Mortgage Woes
4/30/2008
Judge reversed his own ruling that had granted summary judgment to GMAC Mortgage (DAVID J. STERN)
GMAC v Visicaro Case No 07013084CI: florida judge reverses himself: applies basic rules of evidence and overturns his own order granting motion for summary judgment
OVERRULED!!! Florida Judge Reverses His own Summary Judgment Order!
© 2010-12 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
www.StopForeclosureFraud.com

Posted in concealment, conspiracy, CONTROL FRAUD, corruption, djsp enterprises, foreclosure, foreclosure fraud, foreclosure mills, foreclosures, forensic mortgage investigation audit, Law Offices Of David J. Stern P.A., MERS, us bank
Posted on 17 April 2010. Tags: 15 U.S.C. §77q(a), 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5, ABACUS 2007-AC1, ACA, ACA Management LLC ("ACA"), cdo, concealment, conspiracy, corruption, dinsfla, discovery, Exchange Act Rule 10b-5, Fabrice Tourre, flip book, fraud, goldman sachs, hank paulson, HERS, investment banks, john paulson, livinglies, marketing material, material misstatements and omissions, neil garfield, offering memorandum, onewest, Paulson & Co. Inc. ("Paulson"), portfolio
The SEC’s complaint charges Goldman Sachs and Tourre with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5. The Commission seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, prejudgment interest, and financial penalties.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4_v2kREE-o]
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=copoiSMihL8]
Many recall this post below:
Move over GOLDMAN SACHS…WE have a New Player to this Housing “Betting” Crisis…NASDAQ Presenting the Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A. (“DJS”)
Posted in concealment, conspiracy, corruption, geithner, goldman sachs, hank paulson, john paulson, S.E.C., scam