MAJOR WIN FOR HOMEOWNERS IN NJ SUPREME COURT; SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2634-08T2

MAJOR WIN FOR HOMEOWNERS IN NJ SUPREME COURT; SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2634-08T2

MAJOR WIN FOR HOMEOWNERS IN NJ SUPREME COURT; SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2634-08T2

We hold that a series of standardized agreements to cure default between a non-debtor mortgagor and the mortgage servicer are covered by the Consumer Fraud Act, even when executed post-foreclosure.

From: nikoalexopoulos

As a lot of you have come to realize LOAN MODIFICATIONS have not solved anyone’s problems but to put more money into the bank’s pockets and have the homeowner eventually wind up back where they were before the loan mod, but this time with the bank arguing that although they tried to help the homeowner the homeowner fell behind again, therefore they need to finish the foreclosure. The bank also argues that if they were any discrepancies or infractions on the original loan, well by the homeowner agreeing to a LOAN MODIFICATION the original loan is null and void and the terms on the loan modifications are in effect. They also argue that the homeowner basically signed away their rights to the original loan and are bound by the loan mod terms. However the bank still maintains theirs and will seek to foreclose on the homeowner. Well, the judges are beginning to see what we have been saying all along. BE AWARE if fraud was committed in the original loan ti does not make it go away because the bank gave the homeowner a loan modification and it puts the homeowner in a position to seek legal and financial compensation from the bank. GOD BLESS
Here is the detail info:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2634-08T2

This is why getting a Forensic Loan Audit is much needed. This is not something an amateur should attempt leave this to the professionals who have the keen eye for understanding complexities to address all applicable regulatory compliance requirements as well as any Federal and State violations.

Scribd

© 2010-13 FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA. All rights reserved.
www.StopForeclosureFraud.com


DONATE

Related posts:

  1. No to noncourt Foreclosures- Proposal good for banks, Bad for homeowners BY ERIC ENRIQUE • As an attorney who defends homeowners...
  2. Foreclosure Case Law Update: Matthew Weidner Law By: Matthew Weidner P.A. For a short period of time...
  3. MORTGAGE ASSIGNMENTS AS EVIDENCE OF FRAUD, by Lynn Szymoniak, ESQ. MORTGAGE ASSIGNMENTS AS EVIDENCE OF FRAUD Lynn Szymoniak, Esq. Editor,...
  4. Deposition of Angela Melissa Nolan, Robo Signer at Chase Home Finance I swear each time I hear about these ROBO-SIGNERS I immediately...
  5. MERS KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid… "SCAM" If self nominating officers signing on behalf of MERS, et...

This post was written by:

- who has written 5790 posts on FORECLOSURE FRAUD | by DinSFLA.

CONTROL FRAUD | ‘If you don’t look; you don’t find, Wherever you look; you will find’ -William Black

Contact the author

Comments are closed.

GARY DUBIN LAW OFFICES FORECLOSURE DEFENSE HAWAII and CALIFORNIA
Chip Parker, www.jaxlawcenter.com
Timothy Fong, California Foreclosure Defense
Jamie Ranney, www.NantucketLaw.pro
Kenneth Eric Trent, www.ForeclosureDestroyer.com
Susan Chana Lask, www.appellate-brief.com

Archives